|
James I might go along with your story, except for a few things. There was NO BIG BANG. Unless you can describe the Universe 1 second before the supposed Big Bang. Sir Edmond Hubble, made an incorrect conclusion, when he saw the Red-Shift as Recessionary Velocity. I believe that the Red-Shift is caused by the combined gravitational effect of all the Galaxies beyond the edge of the Visible Universe. They farther a Galaxy is from our location, the more it's influenced by the mass beyond it, that we see as the Micro-Wave background energy. If there was a Big-Bang, the first thing to leave the site would be Photons, as the travel at the speed of light in this pristine empty vacuum. The matter follows latter. So what are the Photons bouncing off of, to reflect back to us, creating the alusion of the heat we detect, and think it's reflected back. There will soon be a way to prove this, as we are building some really large telescopes. We need the ability to view an edge on spirial, in the Hubble Deep Field and do spectroscopic analasys on it, to check it's rotational velocity. If it's at the far edge of the Deep Field, it will be receweding at velocities approaching the speed of light. If that's the case, the Galaxy should not show any spin. If it's spinning at the average speed of Galaxies in the Local Group, the Universe is NOT Expanding. Again, light is being pulled on by Galactic matter beyond our range of visibility. Todays Standard model, predicts that the edge of the Visible Universe is essentially all there is. Not so! If they muster the courage to run a test suggested by a Heretic, and find that those far off galaxies are not receeding, beyond normal wandering, I can think of another test.
Suppose that we link all of our Radio Telescopes together in the Additive Interferometer Mode, and scanned the centers of any of those huge bubbles we see at large scale 3d views of the Universe, what would we find? We would find very old Ancient Galaxies. If we tracked all the GRBs, that we are now tracking, and see if they are at the center of these bubbles? There could be millions of Galaxies there, with thousands of Black Holes in every Galaxy, and some of them will collide. We could also closely examine the center of the Einstein Cross. Look for GRBs and use the Radio Relescopes to spot any old dead Galaxies. Even though DEAD, I'm sure they emit plenty of Radio Waves. Also, if our scopes are up to it, we may look at some in areal time and see if there is any Gravitational Lensing events we can detect. With all the Black Holes, there must be many of these events. This is great importance to me because it allows for civilazations that are billions of years beyond us. Some of their craft, may even now being visiting Earth. Some UFOs have designs and physical forms that are perplexing. Some of them seem to change shape. Maybe that's what they want us to see. I would bet money that some of what we see, is "COW-TIPPING" and were the COWS. There are many excursions by different races visiting here. How much does our Govt. know, that's anyones guess. But you can rest assured that the Egyptians, didn't drag over 2.5 million blocks for 30 miles over the desert, if they did, it would be easy to fly a mapping plane over the area between the quarry and the Pyramid and scan for minerals. 2.5 million trips would have left a lot of sawdust behind, and with these new mineral detectors, that sawdust would show up immeadiately. Scientists want you to believe that Pyramids were burial chambers. They were not. When our progenitors developed Nuclear Technology, after arriving here, they had to find a safe place to store Nuclear Waste. So, they built the Pyramids. Just take a directional Geiger counter, down that tunnel under the Big Pyramid. First point it up and all around, then point it down, and you'll see what screwed up their tests.
The wanted a safe place to store it untill when we foumnd it we would recognize what it was, and it worked. Well more later
J Redelfs.
|
