The Macrae Myers Conspiracy Against Truth

Paul Myers, you're already a big black eye to Temple University, so I figured I'd touch base and see if your conspiratorial stench has followed you to the faculty at the University of Minnesota.

[sci.anthropology.paleo removed]

Gosh Ed, what makes you think that? Or is it just because he disagrees with you?

Ed, you're hardly representative of the public.

You haven't demonstrated that there *is* a fraudulent ground section of EC96-001.

If he *did*, he was obviously wrong about that...

Gee Ed, do you have any suggestions about how such a thing would be done, or are you just going to make accusations, rather than back them up?

How would such a thing be done Ed?

Why don't you post a picture of the slide and the specimen it was prepared from, so we can make up our own minds about the possibility of such a thing?

Probably.

What makes you think that?

I'll bet he did.

No, I'll bet he knew that it *was* from EC96-001.

Possibly because they were involved with radiometric imaging. Were there any universities involved in that area of research less than an hour and a half away from Philadelphia? Do you have any evidence that there were?

Why not?

Ed, you've come up with this whole scenario because the results of Andrew's tests weren't to your satisfaction. It's possible that you're just *wrong* about EC96-001, and it's not bone.

No evidence for that so far...

< snip lies and paranoid rantings >

Ed, the American Medical Laboratories does not test rocks, fossils or rocks that look like fossils.

What they DO test - among other things - are kidney stones.

You somehow were able to get your hands on such a report; and you have lied about what it represents.

You have claimed that it was a report on your specimens. Yet it is clear that it is not.

You lied.

And Ed, why is it that Krogman would think of you as a lunatic and refer to you as such to others who knew him?

Why did he never publish anything about your amazing finds if he agreed that they were so amazing and Earth-shattering?

Ed, why did you lie to the readers and tell them that you had an appointment to appear on Larry King, only to claim later that you would not appear and then, still later, admit that you were never scheduled to appear?

You see, Ed, here's the problem: For years, you were thought of as a harmless crank. But as soon as you admitted that your claims of seances and appearances on Larry King were not true, you showed that you CAN make up things that are not true and that you DO have intent to deceive. That's because if you never had said those things, it might be assumed that even though you are clearly wrong about your rocks, if you're having seances and illusions that you're going to appear on a national talk show, it could be that you're just delusional.

Well, admitting that those things were never true is to admit that you DO make things up that YOU KNOW aren't true.

You did the same with the lab reports, Ed. You KNOW you never submitted your specimens to AML, and YOU KNOW that the reports are not reports of tests conducted upon them.

You LIED, Ed.

You're a liar and a fraud.

Please stop picking on Ed. Until I started reading his stuff, I never looked at rocks quite the way I do now. Every single rock I pick up now seems to hold for me the key to some vast, heretofore unknown lost civilization. Or maybe it's just bad clams.

Since I got all messed up on Ed's posts, every rock is a dream to behold. Ed's not a fraud. He's just got rocks on the brain. All is rocks. All is bliss.