AP story on NASA Moon Hoax Un-Rebuttal

AP story on NASA 'Moon Hoax' Un-Rebuttal http://www.space.com/news/oberg_hoaxes_021221.html

Hoaxers vs. Rocket Scientists: Even NASA Unsure How to Counter Claims of Faked Moon Missions By Marcia Dunn Associated Press posted: 10:24 pm ET 21 December 2002

CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (AP)

That, and the fact that many of the conspiracy crackpots out there would see any such effort by NASA as further evidence that the moon landings were hoaxed.

The remote viewers know they weren't hoaxed. They can see the flag on the surface. How do you suppose it got there?

The remote viewers can also see the ruins of a previous civilization on Mars

Ummmmm,errrrrr,BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

'Remote view' THIS!

Happy holidays to all you kooks out there!

Oh Carlyle thinks they're on to something. They'll die with everyone else.

And all the remote viewers will die.

Pity. The universe is a beautiful place. But not for humans as they exist on this planet.

<snip>

I moon for rebuttal your honour

Mmmm... So the moon shots were faked. What about Apollo 13? How many hundreds of amateur sky gazers watched the progress of this? It certainly went around the moon, and is better evidence than a fluttering flag. What about the flag? Why assume that it must be a wind? In the absence of an atmosphere there is little friction to slow the affects of simple harmonic motion and little gravity would only accentuate this. There were 5 moon shots in all I think. Why fake them all, why not quit at one. How about monitoring the radio signals? the direction of these can not be faked.

Besides if it was a fake piece of filmaking the we would have had the Director's Cut released on DVD by now. Complete with the documentary, 'The Making of...', that will be a dead give away!

Isn't it because the moon is too bright for the Hubble optical system?

One sees the light reflected from the spacecraft on course to the

And what would make you think that the moon was 'behind the vehicle'? You need a course in orbital mechanics.

No. The Hubble telescope is indeed able to image the moon. It is just an urban legend that the moon is 'too bright' for its optics

Okey, I stand corrected.....

The reason they don't image the moon is, there's another race there. Read "Sombody Else is on the Moon". It's based on photos from NASA and he gives the number of each photo, and says anyone can order them. There is one picture of the far side of the moon, that shows some large round white balls, that are moving over the enviorment, is several case their rolling up hill, the tracks they leave are very visible. The author, believes they are mining, the Moon. Also, in about 1966, there was a picture on the frontpage of the Paper of a spire, which appeared to be several hundred feet high. They said they know of no natural process that would create such a spire. Now, I'm sure that NASA nad the Govt. don't want the Hubble zooming in on that. Many Astronomers, ameture and professional alike have reported seeing lights moving on the dark parts of the moon. The Hubble camera is fast enough to watch the moon in real time, if they wanted to.

Basically there are things that would be visible with the Hubble that they don't want you to see, but there's a really good book called "Someone Else Is On The Moon". It's baseed on NASA pics, he gives you the number of each photo, and you can get online and get them.

Bhauk. I have a Meade 10 inch Schmidtt Newtonian Telescope, and I have to put a filter on to view the moon. I have never heard how far down they can stop the Iris. If they have the right filters onboard, I use a Polarizing filter. But, since it's been in orbit, I have seen only one washed out picture. They used the excuse of excessive light. But if you have the right receiver and Video processor, you could view it and use a program to do the Darkroom work, I'm getting Photoshop C-4. It costs about $425.00, but I bought a Canon Rebel T1i, then I bought a medium formatt printer. It prints in photo quality at 19 inches by 29 inches. The ink is guarenteed for 98 years in a glass enclosed frame, because unlike most printers it doesn't use the normal dye, which runs when damp. But this printer uses Pigmented Ink. Eventually, I hope to image the Moon as well as the Sun, as I also have a 10 inch Solar Filter. The onboard computet will slew to 35,000 different space objects and more can be downloaded from the net.